Civil Aircraft Duty-Free Treatment: How General Note 6 and the Free (C) Claim Work
Civil aircraft, aircraft engines, ground flight simulators and their parts enter the United States duty free under General Note 6 of the HTSUS when two things are true: the HTS line shows "Free (C)" in the Special column, and the goods meet the civil aircraft definition, meaning use as original or replacement equipment in aircraft plus FAA certification or an FAA-recognized foreign approval. There is no origin test. The importer claims it with the special program indicator C, keeps the order and the airworthiness evidence, and must check every Chapter 99 duty separately, because a Free (C) claim removes only the base rate.
Next step:Price the full duty stack for one SKU
In this post
- Are civil aircraft parts duty free under General Note 6?
- What counts as a "civil aircraft" under General Note 6?
- Why is there no country-of-origin test?
- How do you claim the C special program indicator on the entry summary?
- What records must you keep under 19 CFR 10.183(e)?
- What if you paid duty on parts that qualified?
- How do Section 232 and Section 301 treat civil aircraft parts?
- How do you check General Note 6 eligibility across a parts catalog?
- Keeping civil aircraft claims current across a parts catalog
- References
Verified against the USITC HTS Revision 21 (2026), 19 CFR 10.183 on eCFR and the Federal Register on October 15, 2026. Chapter 99 changes often; recheck before you file.
Are civil aircraft parts duty free under General Note 6?
They can be, and the conditions are narrower than the name of the agreement suggests. General Note 6 implements the Agreement on Trade in Civil Aircraft, which CBP traces to Title VI of the Trade Agreements Act of 1979, effective January 1, 1980 [4]. The note gives a free rate on any HTS provision whose Special column carries the symbol C, which General Note 3(c)(i) assigns to the "Agreement on Trade in Civil Aircraft" [1].
For an aerospace supplier or MRO shop, the practical answer depends on where the part classifies:
- Chapter 88 goods. Airplanes under heading 8802 and parts under heading 8807 (propellers, undercarriages, other parts of airplanes and helicopters) already carry a General rate of Free in Revision 21 [1]. A C claim saves no base duty there.
- Parts that classify outside Chapter 88. Hoses, brackets, motors, turbine parts and cabin fittings often classify by material or function in chapters 39, 83, 84, 85 or 90. Many of those lines carry a General rate above zero, and some of them also list C in the Special column. Which parts leave Chapter 88, and why, is covered in the aircraft parts HTS classification guide.
Retrieved from the USITC on October 15, 2026, Revision 21 lists C in the Special column on 187 rate lines across 122 six-digit subheadings. Every one of those lines has a General rate other than Free: from 1 to 15 percent where the rate is purely ad valorem, plus a few compound rates. That is where the claim earns its keep.
| HTS line (Rev. 21) | Description | General rate | Special includes C |
|---|---|---|---|
| 8302.49.60 | Base metal mountings and fittings, of iron or steel, aluminum or zinc, other | 5.7% | Yes |
| 3917.21.00 | Rigid tubes, pipes and hoses of polymers of ethylene | 3.1% | Yes |
| 8411.99.90 | Parts of gas turbines, other | 2.4% | Yes |
| 8501.31.60 | DC motors of an output not exceeding 750 W, other | 2.4% | Yes |
| 8501.31.40 | DC motors, exceeding 74.6 W but not exceeding 735 W | 4% | No |
Bottom line: For a compliance analyst at a parts distributor, the Special column is the first gate. An FAA certificate cannot make a line free if C is not printed on it, and two neighboring rate lines under 8501.31 already disagree.
Quotable insight: General Note 6 is a classification question before it is a certification question. Revision 21 prints C on 187 rate lines, and within one subheading, 8501.31, it appears on some lines and not others. The same FAA paperwork can therefore support a free entry for one motor and do nothing for the next, which is why the HTS line has to be settled before anyone chases an airworthiness document.
What counts as a "civil aircraft" under General Note 6?
The definition is in General Note 6(b)(i) and is repeated almost word for word in 19 CFR 10.183(a) [1][2]. "Civil aircraft" means any aircraft, aircraft engine or ground flight simulator, including parts, components and subassemblies, that meets both tests:
- Use. It is "used as original or replacement equipment in the design, development, testing, evaluation, manufacture, repair, maintenance, rebuilding, modification, or conversion of aircraft."
- Airworthiness status. It meets one of three conditions:
- manufactured or operated under an FAA certificate issued under 49 U.S.C. 44704, or under the approval of the airworthiness authority in the country of exportation, "if such approval is recognized by the FAA as an acceptable substitute";
- covered by an application for such a certificate submitted to and accepted by the FAA by an existing type and production certificate holder under 49 U.S.C. 44702; or
- covered by an application that an existing type and production certificate holder will submit in the future, pending design or other technical requirements set by the FAA.
General Note 6(b)(iii) limits the third condition to the quantities needed to meet the FAA's stipulated requirements [1].
Defense purchases. General Note 6(b)(ii) excludes goods "purchased for use by the Department of Defense or the United States Coast Guard" unless they meet the use test and the first or second airworthiness condition [1]. In HQ 967954 (2005), CBP held that parts imported for civilian aircraft and later diverted to military aircraft built under FAA type and production certificates stayed within the definition [5]. A ruling applies to its own facts; read it before relying on it.
Why is there no country-of-origin test?
General Note 6 says nothing about where the goods were made. Unlike a free trade agreement claim, there is no tariff shift rule, no regional value content and no certificate of origin. The claim rests on what the goods are for and what airworthiness status they carry.
Two consequences follow for an importer used to FTA work:
- The evidence is different. The file holds an FAA certificate, a foreign authority approval the FAA recognizes, or an accepted application, not a supplier origin declaration.
- The claim is easy to miss. A team that screens for preferences by origin country never sees General Note 6, because nothing about the origin triggers it. The trigger is the C on the HTS line plus the end use.
Origin still matters for everything layered on top. Section 232 and Section 301 duties are origin-driven, and the civil aircraft carve-outs in Chapter 99 differ by origin, as the table further down shows.
How do you claim the C special program indicator on the entry summary?
19 CFR 10.183(c) sets the mechanic: the importer claims duty-free admission "by properly entering qualifying merchandise under a provision for which the rate of duty 'Free (C)' appears in the 'Special' subcolumn of the HTSUS and by placing the special indicator 'C' on the entry summary" [2].
CBP's Form 7501 instructions say where the indicator goes: in column 31, directly below the line number, right justified and "immediately preceding the HTS number to which it applies." If a line needs more than one HTS number, the SPI sits on the line of the number that sets the rate of duty, and when two SPIs are used, the primary one comes first [6]. For a column-by-column walk through the form, see the Form 7501 guide.
By making the claim, the importer "is deemed to certify" that the goods are a civil aircraft, or were imported for use in one and will be so used (19 CFR 10.183(d); General Note 6(a)(ii)) [1][2]. In H300627 (2018), CBP described that certification as a good faith one at importation, backed by records that show it stayed valid afterwards, and noted the importer's obligation to tell CBP if goods are diverted to a non-qualifying use [4].
What records must you keep under 19 CFR 10.183(e)?
Section 10.183(e) lists the support CBP expects for each entry summary that claims the rate [2]:
- the written order or contract;
- evidence of the use test, meaning the goods go into aircraft as original or replacement equipment;
- evidence of airworthiness status, as fits the case: an FAA certification; a foreign authority approval plus evidence the FAA recognizes it; an application submitted to and accepted by the FAA; a type and production certificate; or evidence that a certificate holder will apply, with estimates of the quantities required.
The regulation then sets three rules that shape the risk:
- The documents "need not be filed with the entry summary" but must be kept under the general note and the recordkeeping rules of 19 CFR part 163.
- CBP "may request production of documentation at any time." Failure to satisfy the Center director "will result in a denial of duty-free treatment" and can lead to closer monitoring of the importer's future claims.
- "Proof of end use of the entered merchandise need not be maintained."
H300627 shows how this works for used parts. An MRO planned to import parts removed from one EASA-approved aircraft, repair them at its FAA-certified repair station and resell them. CBP held that the original EASA airworthiness certificate and the later FAA certificates met 10.183(d) and (e), provided the importer kept records showing qualifying use [4].
What if you paid duty on parts that qualified?
The rule gives a route back. Under 19 CFR 10.183(f), an importer can file a written statement claiming General Note 6 "any time prior to liquidation of the entry or prior to the liquidation becoming final," and the statement is itself the claim and the certification [2]. General Note 6(a) adds that any refund from such a claim is paid without interest, notwithstanding 19 U.S.C. 1505(c) [1].
The size of the opportunity is plain arithmetic on the base rate. Illustrative example, Revision 21 rates retrieved October 15, 2026:
| Line | Entered value | General rate | Base duty paid | Base duty under Free (C) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 8302.49.60 cabin brackets | $200,000 | 5.7% | $11,400 | $0 |
| 8411.99.90 turbine parts | $500,000 | 2.4% | $12,000 | $0 |
| Total | $700,000 | $23,400 | $0 |
Bottom line: For a finance lead at an aerospace supplier, the first check is open entries on C lines that were filed without the indicator. Chapter 99 duties and fees are separate, so this table covers the base rate only.
Which window applies to which entry, and how 10.183(f) sits next to a post summary correction or a protest, is covered in the guide to recovering overpaid import duties. GingerControl identifies and documents the opportunity; your licensed broker or counsel files.
How do Section 232 and Section 301 treat civil aircraft parts?
A Free (C) claim removes the base rate. It does not remove Chapter 99 duties, which apply on top unless their own U.S. note carves goods out. Several of those notes now use General Note 6 as the test, and they share one useful phrase: the exemption applies to goods that "otherwise meet the criteria of general note 6," and are in listed provisions, "regardless of whether a product is entered under a provision for which the rate of duty 'Free (C)' appears" [3][7]. So the General Note 6 file can matter even on a Chapter 88 line that is already free.
| Chapter 99 layer | Headings | Civil aircraft treatment | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| Section 301 forced labor duties, from July 24, 2026 | 9903.05.20 to 9903.05.84 | Exempt through 9903.05.88 for goods meeting general note 6 criteria in listed provisions, any origin (U.S. note 52(d)) | 91 FR 47318; HTS Rev. 21 |
| Section 301 action on Brazil, 25%, from July 22, 2026 | 9903.05.01 | Exempt through 9903.05.05 for listed civil aircraft goods of Brazil (U.S. note 50(a)(iv)) | 91 FR 45516 [12]; HTS Rev. 21 |
| Section 232 steel, aluminum and copper | 9903.82.02 to 9903.82.26 (U.S. note 16) | Carve-outs from 9903.82.02 and 9903.82.04 to 9903.82.17 (to 9903.82.19 for Taiwan) for listed civil aircraft goods of the United Kingdom (9903.96.01), Japan (9903.96.02), Taiwan (9903.96.03), the European Union (9903.02.76) and South Korea (9903.02.81); no origin-neutral carve-out in U.S. note 16 | HTS Rev. 21 |
| Section 232 on unmanned aircraft systems, from September 3, 2026 | 9903.08.21, 9903.08.22 | No civil aircraft exception in U.S. note 43 | Proclamation 11055; HTS Rev. 21 |
| Section 232 on commercial aircraft, jet engines and parts | None | No tariff imposed; negotiations directed | Proclamation 11040 |
| Section 301 large civil aircraft dispute | 9903.89.05 to 9903.89.63 | Duties do not apply to UK goods entered from July 4, 2021 or EU goods entered from July 11, 2021 (U.S. notes 21(w) and 21(x)) | 86 FR 36313; HTS Rev. 21 |
Bottom line: For a trade analyst stacking duty on an imported part, the General Note 6 evidence is now doing two jobs: it supports the Free (C) base rate and it unlocks specific Chapter 99 exemptions. Each exemption has its own provision list and origin scope, so check the note, not only the heading.
Points behind the table:
- Forced labor Section 301. USTR's notice exempts "civil aircraft (all aircraft other than military aircraft)" and their parts that meet general note 6 criteria [3]. Country headings are mapped in the 9903.05 headings guide.
- Section 232 metals. The five origin-specific carve-outs each name the provisions they cover, and the EU, Japan, South Korea and Taiwan versions exclude unmanned aircraft in their own text [7]. For goods of other origins, Revision 21 shows no civil aircraft carve-out from the metals duties. The base rules are in the Section 232 steel and aluminum guide.
- Commercial aircraft, Proclamation 11040. Signed July 9, 2026 and published at 91 FR 43507, it records the Commerce Secretary's recommendation "that no immediate tariffs be imposed under section 232" and directs Commerce and USTR to negotiate and to update the President within 180 days. The President "may consider alternative remedies in the future" depending on the outcome [8]. That makes it a watch item, not a duty, as of October 15, 2026.
- Unmanned aircraft, Proclamation 11055. From September 3, 2026, Annex I UAS and components carry 100 percent and Annex II UAS 25 percent, with Annex III components at 25 percent from February 9, 2027. Listed products of companies on the Blue UAS lists or the FCC's Conditional Approval List on September 2, 2026 start 180 days later, and lower caps apply to some partners only where the importer certifies that substantially all critical components and technology come from listed countries. The duties "shall apply in addition to any other duties" [9].
- Section 338 duties on products of Canada. U.S. note 51(d) carves civil aircraft articles other than unmanned aircraft, in listed provisions and meeting general note 6 criteria, out of the 50 percent duties under 9903.03.12 to 9903.03.14, through heading 9903.03.16 [7]. That action's scope has changed several times since July 2026; the current position is in the Canada import guide.
On the large civil aircraft dispute, USTR suspended the action for five years beginning July 4, 2021 for UK goods and July 11, 2021 for EU goods, terminating the tariff action then in place and reserving procedures for possible re-imposition [10]. That five-year period ended in July 2026. Revision 21 still states the duties do not apply to entries on or after the 2021 dates, and a search of USTR documents in the Federal Register on October 15, 2026 found no later notice on the dispute; recheck before relying on it.
How do you check General Note 6 eligibility across a parts catalog?
For one part, the HTS and the certificate file answer the question. Across thousands of part numbers, the work runs in a fixed order:
- Settle the HTS line. Note 2 to Section XVII says "parts" does not cover items such as base metal parts of general use, similar goods of plastics, or machines of headings 8401 to 8479, even when they are identifiable as aircraft parts [11]. Those classify elsewhere, so the line, and with it the C, depends on classification. The Classification Researcher returns a 10-digit code with the GRI reasoning behind it, reads similar CROSS rulings during the classification, and asks what the spec sheet leaves out.
- Read the Special column. Mark which lines print C.
- Match the airworthiness evidence. Tie each part to the FAA certificate, recognized foreign approval or accepted application that covers it.
- Stack Chapter 99 by origin. Check each layer's own civil aircraft note and provision list.
- Review open entries. Look for C lines entered without the indicator while liquidation is not yet final.
Classification results are for general reference and planning; before a code goes on an entry, the importer's licensed customs broker reviews it.
Keeping civil aircraft claims current across a parts catalog
General Note 6 rewards the importer who knows, for every part, its HTS line, whether that line prints C, and which airworthiness document covers it, while the Chapter 99 layers on top keep moving.
GingerControl builds GingerOS, the AI trade compliance platform that runs on your process. GingerOS checks every SKU against a new rule and lists the ones it hits, asks for missing product facts before it suggests an HTS code, records the reasoning for your approval, and checks each entry's HTS code, country of origin and customs value. A project starts with Prototype Week: one call, then a clickable prototype of your own flow in three days, a requirements meeting the same week, and a quote after.
References
- U.S. International Trade Commission, Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States, Revision 21 (2026), General Notes
Data cited: General Note 3(c)(i) symbol C; General Note 6(a) and 6(b) text; General and Special rates for 8302.49.60, 3917.21.00, 8411.99.90, 8501.31.40, 8501.31.60 and Chapter 88 headings; count of rate lines listing C
Source: USITC HTS General Notes, current release
Accessed: October 15, 2026 - Electronic Code of Federal Regulations, 19 CFR 10.183, "Duty-free entry of civil aircraft, aircraft engines, ground flight simulators, parts, components, and subassemblies"
Data cited: applicability, claim method, deemed certification, documentation, post-entry claim, verification
Source: eCFR 19 CFR 10.183
Accessed: October 15, 2026 - Federal Register, USTR, "Notice of Actions in Section 301 Investigations of Acts, Policies, and Practices of Various Economies Related to the Failure of Each Economy To Impose and Effectively Enforce a Prohibition on the Importation of Goods Produced With Forced Labor"
Data cited: July 24, 2026 effective date; civil aircraft exemption under heading 9903.05.88
Source: 91 FR 47318, FR Doc. 2026-15181
Published: July 28, 2026 - U.S. Customs and Border Protection, HQ H300627, "Parts for repair under the Agreement on Trade in Civil Aircraft"
Data cited: history of General Note 6; good faith certification; diversion notice; EASA and FAA certificates as 10.183(e) documentation
Source: CBP CROSS, H300627
Published: October 4, 2018 - U.S. Customs and Border Protection, HQ 967954, "Eligibility under Civil Aircraft Agreement of Parts for Military Aircraft"
Data cited: parts diverted to military aircraft built under FAA type and production certificates
Source: CBP CROSS, 967954
Published: November 23, 2005 - U.S. Customs and Border Protection, CBP Form 7501 Instructions
Data cited: placement of the special program indicator in column 31
Source: CBP Form 7501 and instructions - U.S. International Trade Commission, Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States, Revision 21 (2026), Chapter 99
Data cited: headings 9903.02.76, 9903.02.81, 9903.03.16, 9903.05.05, 9903.05.88, 9903.08.21, 9903.08.22, 9903.82.02 to 9903.82.26, 9903.96.01 to 9903.96.03; subchapter III U.S. notes 16, 21(w), 21(x), 35, 43, 50, 51(d) and 52(d)
Source: USITC HTS Chapter 99, current release
Accessed: October 15, 2026 - Federal Register, Proclamation 11040, "Adjusting Imports of Commercial Aircraft, Jet Engines, and Aircraft and Engine Parts Into the United States"
Data cited: no immediate Section 232 tariffs; negotiations; 180-day update
Source: 91 FR 43507, FR Doc. 2026-14334
Published: July 15, 2026 - Federal Register, Proclamation 11055, "Adjusting Imports of Unmanned Aircraft Systems and Unmanned Aircraft Systems Components Into the United States"
Data cited: 100 and 25 percent rates; September 3, 2026 and February 9, 2027 effective dates; caps for listed partners; stacking clause
Source: 91 FR 53699, FR Doc. 2026-16979
Published: August 19, 2026 - Federal Register, USTR, "Suspension of Action: Enforcement of U.S. WTO Rights in the Large Civil Aircraft Dispute"
Data cited: five-year suspension from July 4, 2021 (UK) and July 11, 2021 (EU)
Source: 86 FR 36313, FR Doc. 2021-14550
Published: July 9, 2021 - U.S. International Trade Commission, Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States, Revision 21 (2026), Section XVII notes
Data cited: Note 2 to Section XVII, articles excluded from "parts"
Source: USITC HTS Section XVII notes (Chapter 86 file), current release
Accessed: October 15, 2026 - Federal Register, USTR, "Notice of Action: Brazil's Acts, Policies, and Practices Related to Digital Trade and Electronic Payment Services"
Data cited: 25 percent duty on imports of Brazil from July 22, 2026; civil aircraft exemption under heading 9903.05.05
Source: 91 FR 45516, FR Doc. 2026-14542
Published: July 20, 2026
Questions people ask
Are aircraft parts duty free when imported into the United States?
Often, but not automatically. Many aircraft goods in Chapter 88 already carry a general rate of Free. Parts classified in other chapters are free only if their HTS line shows Free (C) in the Special column and the part meets General Note 6: used as original or replacement equipment in aircraft and covered by an FAA certificate, an FAA-recognized foreign approval, or a qualifying application.
What does the special program indicator C mean on an entry summary?
C is the special program indicator for the Agreement on Trade in Civil Aircraft, listed in General Note 3(c)(i) of the HTSUS. Under 19 CFR 10.183(c), an importer claims duty-free civil aircraft treatment by entering the goods under a Free (C) provision and placing C on the entry summary, in column 31 directly before the HTS number it applies to.
Does General Note 6 require a certificate of origin?
No. General Note 6 has no country-of-origin test. Eligibility turns on use in aircraft and on airworthiness certification under 49 U.S.C. 44704 or an FAA-recognized foreign approval. The importer is deemed to certify civil aircraft use by making the claim, and keeps the written order or contract and the certification evidence under 19 CFR 10.183(e) and part 163.
What records support a civil aircraft duty-free claim under 19 CFR 10.183?
The written order or contract, evidence of use as original or replacement equipment, and evidence of airworthiness certification: an FAA certificate, an FAA-recognized foreign approval, an accepted application, or a type and production certificate. The records need not be filed with the entry summary, but CBP may ask for them at any time, and a failed request means the claim is denied.
Can an importer claim General Note 6 after the entry was filed without it?
Yes. 19 CFR 10.183(f) allows a written statement claiming duty-free treatment at any time before liquidation or before liquidation becomes final, and General Note 6 says any resulting refund is paid without interest. GingerControl identifies and documents the opportunity; your licensed broker or counsel files.
Does a General Note 6 claim remove Section 232 and Section 301 duties?
Not by itself. Chapter 99 duties apply in addition to the base rate unless their own U.S. note carves goods out. The Section 301 forced labor duties exempt general note 6 civil aircraft through 9903.05.88, and some Section 232 metals carve-outs exist for named origins. The Section 232 duties on unmanned aircraft systems contain no civil aircraft exception.
Are there Section 232 tariffs on commercial aircraft and jet engines?
Not as of October 15, 2026. Proclamation 11040 of July 9, 2026 found that imports of commercial aircraft, jet engines and their parts threaten to impair national security, but imposed no tariff. It directed Commerce and USTR to negotiate and to report within 180 days, and said other remedies may follow depending on the outcome.
Not sure what the next tariff change costs you?
Hand this to GingerOS.
Pick a 30-minute slot on the next page with Chen Cui, our CEO. Bring one notice or one SKU list (an ERP export, a spreadsheet or an email will do) and see what GingerOS does with it.
Reviewed by Michael Weick, LCB / CCS




