Section 122 Tariff Authority : What the Law Means for U.S. Trade
Section 122 and tariff policy in 2026: a concise guide to the law, the Federal Register proclamation, and what importers should know.
Co-Founder of GingerControl, Building scalable AI and automated workflows for trade compliance teams.
Connect with me on LinkedIn! I want to help you :)Table of Contents
- What Section 122 is
- How Section 122 works
- Why Section 122 matters for trade and tariff policy
- Section 122 in recent policy action
- How Section 122 compares with other tariff authorities
- What businesses and importers should watch
- FAQ
- Conclusion
- Sources
What Section 122 is
Section 122 usually refers to Section 122 of the Trade Act of 1974, a presidential authority that can be used when the United States faces a fundamental international payments problem or serious balance-of-payments issue. In that setting, the President may temporarily restrict imports through a surcharge or other limits. The White House’s February 25, 2026 proclamation states that Section 122 authorizes a temporary import surcharge of up to 15% for no more than 150 days unless Congress extends it.
Section 122 is not a broad, general tariff power. It is a specific emergency trade tool tied to a defined economic condition. That makes it different from other tariff and import authorities Congress has granted over time.
How Section 122 works
Section 122 is best understood as a short-term emergency measure. In the February 25, 2026 proclamation, the President stated that the action was being taken to address a “large and serious United States balance-of-payments deficit.” The proclamation also invokes Section 604 of the Trade Act of 1974 as the mechanism for reflecting the action in the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States.
The Congressional Research Service explains that Section 122 differs from many other tariff laws because it does not depend on an agency investigation in the same way antidumping, countervailing duty, or Section 232 actions often do. In other words, Section 122 is a presidential emergency tool, not a case-by-case trade remedy process.
For general readers, the practical sequence is straightforward:
- A qualifying payments problem exists — a serious international payments or balance-of-payments issue.
- The President issues a proclamation — the February 25, 2026 action is the current example.
- Imports may face a temporary surcharge or limit — subject to the statutory cap described in the proclamation.
- The action is temporary — the proclamation describes a 150-day limit unless Congress extends it.
Why Section 122 matters for trade and tariff policy
Section 122 matters because it sits at the intersection of trade, tariff, and macroeconomic policy. It is not product-specific. Instead, it can affect the cost of imports across the economy, which is why importers, retailers, manufacturers, and consumers may all feel the impact.
The policy significance is also legal. The Constitution gives Congress the power to regulate foreign commerce, and CRS notes that broad claims of presidential tariff authority can raise major legal questions. That is one reason analysts continue to scrutinize Section 122 whenever it appears in modern tariff debates.
Section 122 in recent policy action
2026 update
On February 25, 2026, the White House published “Imposing a Temporary Import Surcharge to Address Fundamental International Payments Problems.” The proclamation is the clearest current federal statement of Section 122’s use in 2026.
The Federal Register version of the same action confirms the operative framework and implementation details. It states that the surcharge is issued under Section 122, references coordination with the U.S. Trade Representative, and notes that the action may be suspended, modified, or terminated if circumstances change.
For readers tracking trade policy, the key point is that Section 122 is not merely historical. It is a live tariff authority that can change import conditions on short notice. Businesses may need to adjust sourcing, pricing, customs compliance, and inventory planning quickly if the authority is used.
How Section 122 compares with other tariff authorities
Section 122 is only one of several tools the U.S. government can use in trade enforcement and import policy. The distinctions matter:
- Section 122: a temporary emergency import surcharge tied to balance-of-payments or international payments problems.
- Section 232: national-security-based tariffs, such as steel and aluminum tariffs, which the White House highlighted in February 2025.
- IEEPA-based tariffs: a separate and heavily debated approach that has generated significant legal controversy in 2025 and 2026. CRS notes that some analysts question whether IEEPA can properly support tariffs at all.
- Antidumping and countervailing duties: trade remedies imposed after investigations into unfair pricing or subsidization.
When policymakers talk about tariffs, they may be referring to different legal authorities with different purposes, timelines, and legal risks. Section 122 is narrower than a general tariff program, but it can still have broad market effects.
What businesses and importers should watch
If you import goods into the United States, Section 122 is worth monitoring for four reasons:
1. It can affect landed cost quickly
A surcharge can raise the cost of imported goods almost immediately after implementation, which can affect margins, pricing, and contract performance.
2. It may apply broadly
Unlike product-specific trade cases, a Section 122 action can be broad enough to affect many categories of imports at once.
3. It may be temporary, but temporary still matters
Even a short-lived tariff can disrupt purchase orders, transportation schedules, and customs entries. The White House described the authority as temporary and cited a 150-day limit unless Congress extends it.
4. It can shift the policy conversation
When Section 122 is used, it signals that trade policy is being tied to a macroeconomic emergency narrative rather than an industry-specific dispute. That can influence other policy actions and market expectations.
FAQ
What is Section 122 in plain English?
Section 122 is a U.S. trade-law provision that can allow the President to temporarily impose import restrictions, including a surcharge, when the country faces a serious international payments problem.
Is Section 122 the same as a general tariff power?
No. It is narrower and tied to a specific emergency condition. CRS describes it as distinct from other tariff laws that rely on investigations or different legal findings.
How long can a Section 122 surcharge last?
The White House said in its February 25, 2026 proclamation that the surcharge may last no more than 150 days unless Congress extends it.
Does Section 122 still matter in 2026?
Yes. The February 25, 2026 proclamation and Federal Register publication show that Section 122 remains a live part of U.S. tariff policy.
Conclusion
Section 122 remains an important but narrow tool in U.S. trade law. In 2026, it is relevant not just as a historical statute, but as a current tariff authority that can be used to address a fundamental international payments problem. The February 25, 2026 proclamation and its Federal Register publication make that clear.
For businesses and importers, the practical lesson is to watch for Section 122 actions early, because even a temporary surcharge can quickly affect landed costs, compliance planning, and supply chains. For legal and policy observers, the broader issue is how Section 122 fits alongside other tariff authorities and how far presidential import powers can extend under existing law.
Sources
[^1]: The White House, Imposing a Temporary Import Surcharge to Address Fundamental International Payments Problems, published 2026-02-25. [^2]: Federal Register, 2026-03824, published 2026-02-25. [^3]: Congressional Research Service, Congressional and Presidential Authority to Impose Import Tariffs, published 2025-12-18. [^4]: Congressional Research Service, Congressional and Presidential Authority to Impose Import Tariffs, published 2025-12-18. [^5]: Congressional Research Service, Legal Authority for the President to Impose Tariffs Under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA), published 2025-03-01. [^6]: The White House, Fact Sheet: President Donald J. Trump Restores Section 232 Tariffs, published 2025-02-11.
Legal background
For historical context, see 19 U.S. Code § 122 at the Legal Information Institute, which also notes the repeal history of the provision. [^7]
[^7]: Legal Information Institute, 19 U.S. Code § 122.

Written by
Chen Cui
Co-Founder of GingerControl
Building scalable AI and automated workflows for trade compliance teams.
LinkedIn ProfileYou may also like these
Related Post
SimplyDuty vs GingerControl: Duty Calculator API Compared 2026
I compare SimplyDuty and GingerControl on duty calculator coverage, HS classification accuracy, API pricing, and tariff stack depth for US imports in 2026.
Top Customs Duty Estimation Systems Compared in 2026
Compare the top customs duty lookup and cost estimation systems for compliance teams: GingerControl, Descartes, Thomson Reuters, SAP GTS, Flexport, Avalara.
IEEPA Tariff Refund Guide: ACE, CAPE Process & Deadlines
I walk through the IEEPA tariff refund process for importers, covering ACE setup, CAPE declarations, protest deadlines, and how to organize claims at scale.